Make It Permanent…A Member’s Right to Speak

Opinion–Larry Landaker

free speech zoneSeveral months ago it became clear that the right of members to speak before the Board of Directors was a protection absent in the Bylaws or Member Bill of Rights under the Articles. Reform framers of the Member Bill of Rights (including me) never imagined that the right to speak before a reformed PEC would be questioned. During the Fuelberg rein members were not permitted to speak or even attend board meetings–actions which contributed to a member revolt and lawsuit.

In hindsight a free speech omission in the Member Bill of Rights was a mistake. Last summer, the new board president attempted to silence (by executive fiat) a member, Ernest Altgelt. When Mr. Altgelt tried to speak before the Board, he was escorted by the police from the room with the consent of the presiding officer, Board President James Oakley.  Mr. Oakley took the occasion to lecture Mr. Altgelt and the members present about his new rules. He declared that he had unilaterally changed the rules of decorum (which had been unanimously passed by the Board several years prior) and which had served it well ever since. Mr. Oakley suggested that member comments were somehow a “privilege” granted by the chairman, that they could be taken away at any time and that comments had to be “germane” to the topics of the day, etc. In essence, the board president was saying, if I don’t like what I hear I can cut off your microphone.

Out of this incident and ensuing brouhaha (and to its credit), the Board took action and on August 31, 2015, unanimously approved an amended Open Meetings Policy:  Section 1, Paragraph 1 of the Open Meetings Requirement now reads as follows:

A Member has the right to attend every regular, special or called Meeting of the Board of Directors (Board) and Board Committees (Committees), except for Executive Sessions as allowed by this policy or by law. All meetings shall be called with proper notice, and any final action, decision, or vote on a matter shall be made in an Open Meeting.

A Member has the right to speak before the Board of Directors or any regular special or called meeting of the board and Committees on any PEC matter at a designated time in accordance with the Decorum Policy.

Recognizing that this action did not go far enough, at that same meeting  on August 31, a vote was taken on  resolution #3209 directing the General Counsel, Don Richards, to draft language amending the Member Bill of Rights in such a way that guarantees the right of members to speak and which cannot be taken away by future boards or chair. Boards will come and go. Policies can be changed or dropped depending on the whim of a board at any given time. Only the Member Bill of Rights can legally guarantee a right that cannot be taken away, except by a member vote.Bill-of-Rights

There seems now to be some equivocation at play. Thus far, no draft of this language or discussion of it has been seen or heard by the Board. One wonders why.  If members of the Board now believe that Pedernales Electric Cooperative members cannot be guaranteed a right to speak before the Board, it strikes me that they have missed the entire essence of the democratic reforms that distinguish PEC from almost every electric cooperative in the nation–open records, open meetings, fair elections. If they are struggling to find precedent for democracy in action within the cooperative world, they need only look to their own cooperative. If such an amendment is to appear on the ballot in June, the Board and  its General Counsel must quit dithering and approve the language–language which has already been ably crafted in the above Open Meetings requirement and which can be easily inserted into the Member Bill of Rights.

It is important that this happen. In the spirit of the other rights guaranteed to members, a free speech inclusion may well be the most important. The right of free speech is in fact, the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution for good reason. Without it there can be no true democratic governance.

There is important work to do at PEC and the Board and management need to get on with it–but it must not neglect the hard work of governing PEC as a democratic institution–a condition that was hard fought and won by the members. Nobody says democratic governance is easy but that is the essence of today’s PEC and the alternative is completely unacceptable.


3 thoughts on “Make It Permanent…A Member’s Right to Speak

  1. Larry-

    Your rendition of the depicted meeting as well as my perspective is simply an embellished opinion on your part and should in no way be associated with the heading of “truth”. The incident you reference was handled the way it should have been in the past. There has been a long standing decorum policy in place, it was merely enforced. I find it interested that you don’t include how I have invited you and other members present to ask questions and speak beyond the member comment item on the agendas. In the last election, the membership defined the value of your opinion. I will not be defined by you.


    • James, You’re as thin-skinned as Donald Trump with the same selective memory. The July meeting was well attended, documented, videotaped and photographed–I do not believe I embellished on the facts one iota. And the fact that you were caught changing the rules of decorum on your own does not win you much sympathy. That you want to make this all about YOU is to miss the point entirely. The question is whether the Board intends to fulfill the intent it advanced in a unanimous resolution directing the General Counsel to add language to the Bill of Rights for member ratification that will permanently protect the member-OWNERS right to speak. Please give us an answer to that question, President Oakley.


      • Well Larry, if it wasn’t about me, then why did you mention me ? I would invite folks to watch the meeting video then compare to your version. I have never indicated that I don’t believe in members right to speak. I have indicated that I will and have enforced the decorum policy approved by the board. Defending one’s self from cowardly false attacks is hardly thin skinned. Move on Larry, the members asked that of you.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s